Tools

Make, n8n, or custom code? When to reach for which

2026-01-22

Three approaches to automation differ in deployment speed, cost, and where your data lives. An overview of when to reach for which.

01

Make and Zapier: the fastest start

Visual tools like Make or Zapier are a good fit when you need to connect common SaaS apps quickly without writing code. Deployment takes days, not weeks, and your team can learn to manage it themselves after a short handover.

The downside is that data flows through the provider's infrastructure, and for genuinely complex logic you'll hit the limits of a visual editor.

02

n8n: a compromise between speed and control

n8n offers similarly fast visual deployment to Make, but can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure. It's our default choice when a client wants low development cost but also needs to keep data under their control.

03

Custom code: when scale or specific logic matters

Custom-coded solutions make sense for high data volumes, complex decision rules, or when deep integration with an internal system is needed that a visual tool can't reach. Development takes longer, but the result can handle volume and logic a low-code tool couldn't.

04

How we choose at the start of a project

We don't start with a tool — we start with a number. We calculate the payback for both a low-code and a custom-coded option and recommend whichever pays back faster and scales more easily with your company's volume going forward.

Ready to save dozens of hours a month?

A free, no-obligation consultation. Describe your process, and we'll tell you whether automation pays off.